Assistant D.A. Accused of Planting Evidence in Cop's
Rape Case
By Seamus McGraw
Oct. 26, 2000
NEW ORLEANS (APB) -- A judge ordered a mistrial in the case of a police
officer accused of rape and sentenced the assistant district attorney on
the case to jail for allegedly tampering with evidence.
"I draw no pleasure in reaching this decision," Criminal Court Judge
Arthur Hunter said Wednesday as he slapped Assistant District Attorney
Lionel Lon Burns with a six-month jail sentence. "Each of us within the
criminal justice system have the duty not only to administer justice but
to follow the law and demonstrate to society defendants will receive a
fair trial and victims will secure justice."
The sentence is the stiffest allowed under Louisiana law. Burns was
freed hours later pending an appeal, court officials said.
Second trial for officer
The judge's dramatic move came at the start of the second trial of
George Lee III, a city police officer accused of raping five women, among
them prostitutes, after threatening to arrest them. In April, Hunter declared
a mistrial in the case after prosecutors allegedly failed to provide defense
attorneys with transcripts of a statement by a witness who claimed that
sex with at least one of the alleged victims was consensual, court records
show. A separate trial in January on charges that Lee allegedly kidnapped
and sexually battered one of the five victims ended in a hung jury.
Questionable napkins
The trial had just begun Monday, according to court documents, when
Burns produced a wad of paper napkins that he claimed Lee had used to tidy
himself up after allegedly attacking one of the victims. Burns claimed
that he found the napkins in the pocket of Lee's trousers while preparing
last week for the new trial, court records show. But defense attorneys
demanded a mistrial, arguing they had been blindsided by the revelation,
and accused Burns of planting the new evidence.
On Wednesday, out of earshot of the jury, the judge agreed. 'Implausible
and improbable' In a six-page decision, Hunter described Burn's claims
that he had suddenly discovered the napkins last week as "implausible and
improbable." The judge noted that neither the police officer who had initially
seized the trousers as evidence nor the evidence clerk who logged them
in ever noticed the napkins that Burns claimed had been in the pocket all
along. Hunter also noted that two of Burn's fellow prosecutors who had
helped him prepare for the case had been unaware of the napkins until they
were suddenly produced in the second day of the case.
"Assistant District Attorney Tony Rovello testified he was responsible
for tracking the evidence, and specifically remembered examining the defendant's
uniform and other clothing ... and did not find the thick wad of napkins,"
Hunter wrote.
Assistant District Attorney Zaren James also denied any knowledge of
the napkins, Hunter wrote. Only Assistant District Attorney Keeva Landrum
knew anything about the new evidence, the judge wrote. She told the court
that Burns had told her about them, but that she had never seen them.
Constructive contempt
The judge then ordered a mistrial and cited Burns for constructive
contempt, described under Louisiana law as "an act ... tending to obstruct
or interfere with the orderly administrative of justice."
It was not immediately clear whether prosecutors would seek to try Lee
a third time. The judge's order barred prosecutors and defense attorneys
from discussing the case with the media. |