Last Chance Class
David Protess's students have freed three men from death row. They have
a case now that they believe in—and haven't won.
By Martha Brant
Aaron Patterson was never one to walk away from a fight. The Illinois
death-row inmate admits that back in the '80s, when he was the feared leader
of Chicago's Apache Rangers, plenty of his street gang's enemies learned
just how relentless he could be. Patterson's stubborn streak was still
on display in 1989, when he was condemned to die for the murder of an elderly
couple: he kept shouting in the courtroom that the cops had tortured a
confession out of him. "You're holding me for a murder I didn't even do!"
he yelled at the judge. For 10 years on death row, Patterson, 34, kept
mouthing off—producing pamphlets, recording audio tapes, haranguing lawyers
and writing to newspapers and anyone else who might listen to his claim
that he didn't kill Rafaela and Vincent Sanchez. One of his letters reached
Prof. David Protess at Northwestern University.
The journalism professor shares the prisoner's flair for getting attention.
The 53-year-old teacher is something of a celebrity after helping to free
three wrongly accused men from Illinois' death row. (Hollywood producer
Jerry Bruckheimer is at work on a feature movie about him.) Protess can
afford to be picky when it comes to capital-punishment subjects for his
investigative-reporting class. Since he and his student sleuths helped
spring another convict, Anthony Porter, in February, Protess estimates
he's received 2,000 e-mails and letters. "My home number is scribbled on
every death row in the country," he says.
Something in the vehemence of Patterson's letter resonated with Protess.
The story of their now-intertwined lives casts light on the role Protess
and his students are playing in the enduring American debate over the death
penalty. The Patterson case may be another triumph—or, just possibly, there
won't be a happy ending this time. Protess and 15 of his amateur investigators
have chipped away at the case against Patterson over two school years.
But as this year's class has found, it's hard enough to get a case re-opened
with DNA evidence; without it in this case, the task seems nearly impossible.
Next month, Patterson could exhaust his state appeals. If the Illinois
Supreme Court does not grant a new hearing, he'll plod through the federal
courts. "If he doesn't get out of there, then there is something really
wrong with the justice system," insists senior Genevieve Marshall.
Team Patterson didn't always believe so passionately that their man
was innocent. Protess had told them only to "find the truth." But they
did know one disturbing statistic: for every seven executions nationwide
since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, one death-row inmate has
been set free. In Northwestern University's own state, Illinois, there
have been just as many exonerations as executions. Last week, Ronald Jones
became the 12th man to walk off the state's death row (and the 79th nationally)
when DNA evidence proved he could not have committed the rape and murder
he was convicted of. Even Protess's critics give him part of the
credit for Illinois' streak of releases, and for raising national awareness
of the argument for tightening the rules for the death penalty. Just last
week, the Nebraska Legislature voted for a moratorium on executions.
On the first day of class at Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism
last fall, the students sat nervously as Protess straddled his chair and
warned them to brace themselves for a "tough emotional ride." Most had
already heard about the rigors of investigation—and the challenge of dealing
with a volatile, autocratic, spotlight-loving professor. Still, they queued
up to get into his class. Dave Rogers, an aspiring FBI agent from Massachusetts,
wanted to scrutinize the law from the inside out; California's Bernice
Yeung wanted training in "social justice" journalism. Sheri Hall, from
suburban Detroit, was one of the doubters who drove two hours to visit
Patterson at the maximum-security Pontiac Correctional Center. After passing
through three locked gates, she finally sat across from him, separated
by a thick glass divider. "He put me at ease right away," Hall says. They
talked music, current events. A college and National Guard dropout, Patterson
impressed her as bright. He had read everything in his file and studied
the law books at the prison library. When asked straight out if he had
killed the couple, he looked her in the eye and said: "Nah, I wouldn't
kill no old people."
Patterson says that 12 days after the Sanchezes were stabbed to death,
police rounded him up and handcuffed him to a ring in the wall of an interrogation
room. For an hour, Patterson denied to detectives that he had killed the
couple. Then he claims they got impatient: "The lights went out and they
bum-rushed me." He says a thick plastic bag was forced tight against his
face as detectives started beating his chest. They "bagged" him again,
he explains, and warned him to confess or he'd "get something worse." "They
are going to kill me up in here," Patterson recalls thinking. So he consented
to an oral confession but refused to sign the written version. With a paper
clip snatched off the desk, Patterson scratched a message onto a metal
bench that was discovered several days later: "Aaron 4/30 I lie about urders/Police
threaten me with violence/Slapped and suffocated me with plastic."
But a physical exam at the jail revealed no signs of abuse, and the
jury apparently found it hard to believe that Patterson, the son of a Chicago
police lieutenant, would be mistreated. (His father, now retired and living
in Virginia, believes his son.) The police version of his confession seemed
more credible. According to cops, on April 18, 1986, Patterson (already
wanted for two attempted murders) headed out to steal guns from the Sanchezes,
who were well-known neighborhood fences. The couple resisted.
According to police, this is what Patterson said about what happened
next: "I came up on Sanchez like a straight-up Ninja. He got shanked...
His old lady tried to run. I did her, too. I had that chick swinging everywhere."
The 73-year-old Sanchez was stabbed 25 times; his wife, 62, nine times.
In the cluttered office of Patterson's pro bono lawyers, the Northwestern
students began to comb through a three-foot pile of court documents. They
read about nine other death-row inmates who claim they were tortured in
the same police district and learned that an internal police investigation
in 1990 had found "systematic" abuse, including electroshock and "ear cupping."
There also was no physical evidence linking Patterson to the crime.
The knife was never recovered; the fingerprints found at the scene weren't
a match (and have disappeared since). Patterson's codefendant, Eric Caine,
who told police Patterson did it, said he, too, had been beaten; a medical
exam later revealed a shattered ear drum. "I was scared," Caine told the
students. "I was making up a story."
That left the testimony of a 16-year-old named Marva Hall. She'd told
the jury that Patterson, while trying to sell her a shotgun two days after
the murders, had boasted about the killings. Two students, Delores Patterson
(no relation) and Marc Graser, tracked her to the small Alabama town of
Dothan. They used their own money for the cheapest tickets to Atlanta,
then drove four hours south. As they waited in front of Hall's little house,
they practiced role-playing, a technique Protess had drilled into them.
He had them knock on his classroom door and try to stammer their way in,
then slammed the door in their faces and made them try harder. "Do you
think a mild-mannered reporter gets people out of prison?" he said.
His tactics seem to work. Protess's students talked their way into Hall's
tidy living room, and soon she was pouring out a tale that didn't match
her courtroom testimony. Patterson had tried to sell her uncle a shotgun,
but that was two weeks before the murder. As she would later swear in an
affidavit, she claimed that the state's attorney, Jack Hynes, had pressured
her into changing the timetable. Afraid of being jailed, she cooperated.
"It was like I was reading a script," she said of her testimony. Hynes
denies threatening or coaching Hall. He says she would only change her
story because of threats from Patterson. But Hall says she's trying to
undo a wrong. "I helped send [an] innocent man to jail," she told the students.
Protess had been pacing his house for hours when he got their news. "Holy
s---!" he yelled into the phone.
Many of Protess's students have come to share his bravado—and
few tell their parents where they go on assignment. This term the students
visited Patterson's South Side neighborhood, trying to answer the question
"If Patterson didn't kill the Sanchezes, who did?" They read an affidavit
obtained by Patterson's lawyers claiming that a neighborhood troublemaker,
Willie Washington, had proposed robbing the Sanchezes before their murder—and
discovered that Washington had been convicted in 1994 of stabbing a woman
two dozen times during a burglary similar to the Sanchez case. Further
digging revealed that a neighborhood man, Charlie Tillery, said he had
seen Washington with a stash of guns soon after the murders.
The students, working in groups of two or three, began "to stalk Charlie,"
says Marshall, who drove a dozen times to the neighborhood. Chicago police
warn that these trips are terribly dangerous, but Medill's dean says he
is comfortable with Protess's precautions: he coaches kids on how to assess
the risk, spot gang colors and steer clear of the toughest housing projects.
In fact the students were more frustrated than frightened. For months,
they camped outside Tillery's house on a street known for drive-by shootings
and drug deals. On a good day they'd tail Tillery to the liquor store and
grab a few minutes of conversation—once even getting him to admit on tape
that he bought a gun from Washington shortly after the murders. On a bad
day, Tillery's girlfriend would come out and yell: "Get out of here, white
people!"
Protess tells his class to stay objective, but they all get personally
involved. His desk is cluttered with photos of himself with the men he
has freed. He spent this past Valentine's Day with Porter, who was having
personal problems after release from prison. At one point, the professor
discovered that his own preteen son was staying home on Saturday nights
to
take collect calls from a lonely death-row prisoner. Protess's students
often repeat his seminar for no credit, work 30-hour weeks and weekends
and sometimes see the class dissolve into tears of disappointment and recriminations
over tactics. "Not a day goes by that I don't think about the case," Graser
says. "It haunts me."
After one condemned man they were trying to exonerate lost his appeal
and was executed in 1995, Protess called in a grief counselor for the devastated
students. Northwestern has considered pulling the plug on the course. "He
has all the plusses and all the problems of a religious martyr," says the
former dean, Michael Janeway. Protess, who got his start as a better-government
watchdog, found that changing one life was a bigger "rush."
Team Patterson graduates in June. Willie Washington continues to insist
to the students that he knows nothing about the Sanchez murders. Patterson's
lawyers hope to convince the court that their client deserves another hearing
because of the new evidence and shoddy representation. (Patterson cycled
through eight public defenders at trial; a commercial litigator with no
criminal-law background handled his appeal.) As for Protess, he'll help
launch the new Center for Wrongful Convictions and the Death Penalty
this fall at Northwestern, and will keep probing Patterson's case and others.
In the meantime, Aaron Patterson remains on death row. "With Protess on
my case, I've got some credibility," he says. He firmly believes that the
next time he's shouting in a courtroom, it will be for joy.
Newsweek, May 31, 1999
|