
September 30, 2011
Judge Overturns Conviction and Vacates Life Sentence of
Northern California Innocence Project Client

NCIP Supervising
Attorney, Paige Kaneb and Obie Anthony
|
In a case representing a record third
exoneration in one year,
NCIP lawyers assist in getting a Los Angeles man’s murder and attempted
robbery convictions set aside by uncovering new evidence of innocence
LOS ANGELES and SANTA CLARA, CA – September 30, 2011 – A Los
Angeles County superior court judge today threw out the 1995 murder and
attempted robbery convictions of Northern California Innocence Project
(NCIP) client Obie Anthony.
Judge Kelvin Filer granted the habeas petition on the basis of the
cumulative harm of prosecutorial misconduct, specifically the trial
prosecutor's failure to correct the false testimony of its key witness,
and the prosecution's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence to the
defense, specifically the fact that the prosecution’s key witness
received a “sweetheart deal” in exchange for his testimony against Mr.
Anthony.
In overturning the conviction, Judge Filer said that the prosecution’s
chief witness, around whom the entire case for trial was built, “will
say almost anything to avoid consequences to himself . . . in an
earlier proceeding, he lied about the death of his own mother.”
|
Judge Filer issued the order after lawyers for
NCIP at Santa
Clara University School of Law, who have represented Anthony for three
years, along with lawyers from Loyola Law School’s Project for the
Innocent, presented evidence of his innocence during an 11-day
evidentiary hearing earlier this month.
During the hearing Anthony’s lawyers demonstrated the prosecution’s key
witness had lied repeatedly at trial and that the prosecution knew of
his lies but failed to correct them for the jury. They also presented
evidence that the prosecution suppressed evidence that impeached its
witnesses, that Anthony is actually innocent, and that Anthony’s
defense attorney at trial failed to investigate and present information
that suggested Jones was the actual killer.
Mr. Anthony’s team of lawyers was comprised of NCIP lawyers Paige
Kaneb, Linda Starr and Seth Flagsberg, Loyola Law School’s Project for
the Innocent lawyers Adam Grant and Laurie Levenson, and Federal Public
Defender Investigator Deborah Crawford. Law students from Santa Clara
University School of Law and Loyola Law School also assisted.
“This conviction should have never happened,” said NCIP Legal Director
Linda Starr. “Police purposely ignored and hid evidence that did not
support their theory, and manipulated the witnesses to create evidence
to support their misguided tunnel vision. The prosecution falsely
denied that they granted their star witness a deal for his cooperation
and failed to correct his lies at trial. And Mr. Anthony’s own attorney
failed to investigate the case. For their failures, Mr. Anthony has
spent 17 years in prison for a murder that he did not commit - and the
actual murderer has remained free. This cannot be considered justice.”
“Obie Anthony is an innocent man who has survived this ordeal with
grace and courage,” said NCIP attorney Paige Kaneb. “Even now, Mr.
Anthony is not angry. Instead, he just wants to start his life as a
free man, go to college, and then devote his time to helping others.”
The Crime
Anthony was convicted of the March 27, 1994 attempted robbery and
murder of Felipe Gonzales primarily based on the testimony of one star
witness, John Jones, a pimp with a prior manslaughter conviction.
Shortly before midnight that evening, Felipe Gonzales, Victor Trejo,
and Luis Jimenez drove to a house of prostitution in Los Angeles on the
corner of 49th Street and Figueroa Street. Gonzales got out to solicit
the services of one of the prostitutes, while the others remained in
the vehicle. Security guards employed by John Jones–who operated the
house of prostitution–informed Gonzales that the woman he asked about
was unavailable and that he should return the next day. As he walked
back to the car, three or four men surrounded him and the car,
demanding money.
According to the victims, one of the robbers opened the passenger door
and began shooting at the occupants, at which point Trejo drove away.
Trejo saw Gonzales running, and as the car turned the corner he heard
more shots, but saw nothing more.
Gonzales’ body was found on the corner of 49th and Figueroa.
Police had no leads on the crime, until one month later, when Elliot
Santana falsely claimed to have been carjacked at gunpoint by three
men, and identified Anthony and two of his friends, Reggie Cole and
Michael Miller, as those men. Police proceeded to put photographs of
Anthony, Cole and Miller into photographic lineups and showed the
lineups to witnesses to the Gonzales murder.
Of the seven people shown the photographs, only one, John Jones,
positively identified Anthony and Cole. No one identified Miller. Based
on Jones’ identifications, Anthony and Cole were arrested and charged
with the murder of Gonzales and related offenses. Police then conducted
a live lineup and again, Jones was the sole person to positively
identify Anthony.
The prosecution’s case at trial rested entirely on eyewitness
testimony. The fingerprints lifted from the car did not match Anthony
or Cole, nor did shoeprints taken from the scene. Detectives found no
murder weapon or clothing that matched the descriptions provided by
witnesses. In fact, no physical evidence ever connected either man to
the crime. Both Anthony and Cole presented numerous alibi witnesses who
testified that the two men were home on the night of the murder.
Despite this, both were convicted and received prison sentences of life
without the possibility of parole.
The carjacking counts for which Anthony and Cole were originally
identified, were dismissed when Santana revealed prior to his
testimony—but after opening statements in which the jury heard about
both crimes—that he had fabricated the allegation because he didn’t
want his wife to find out he had been with a prostitute. The jury was
informed only that the charges were dismissed and they were not to
speculate why.
Re-investigation Uncovers Evidence of Innocence
An NCIP team, along with a Loyola Law School team and Federal Public
Defender Investigator Deborah Crawford, conducted an exhaustive
re-investigation of the case. They uncovered new evidence that the
prosecution had concealed from the defense that John Jones was rewarded
for his testimony and lied about it at trial.
Jones also signed a declaration swearing that he never actually saw the
perpetrators well enough to identify them. He explained at the hearing
that he had obtained descriptions of the perpetrators from others and
that the detectives had indicated which photographs they expected him
to select, and then fed him false information that gave him confidence
in his identifications of Anthony and Cole, including information that
one of them had been shot.
Further, Anthony’s attorneys uncovered and presented numerous witnesses
who say that Jones employed armed security to protect his building,
that Jones always carried a gun and fired at people to protect his
business, that Jones was on the roof that night, and that the
ballistics evidence shows that the fatal shot was more likely to have
come from the roof than from the ground.
In addition, Luis Jimenez, one of the surviving victims who was never
interviewed by defense counsel and did not testify at trial, testified
at the evidentiary hearing that the shooters were not teenagers and
were at least 25-30 years old. Anthony and Cole were teenagers at the
time. Jimenez also testified that he had studied the people in the
six-packs and live lineups, wanting to make identification because the
police said they had caught the perpetrators, but he simply did not
recognize anyone.
The court ordered Anthony released on his own recognizance, pending the
completion of release paperwork.
Contact:
Linda Starr, NCIP Legal Director: 408-718-3910
Northern California Innocence Project: 408-554-4790
Paige Kaneb, NCIP Supervising Attorney: 908-892-3170
|