
The word of one witness put Michael Mordenti ON DEATH
ROW
What the jurors didn't know could
kill him.
Mar 14, 2004
CHRISTOPHER GOFFARD
|

Michael Mordenti
|
Homicide detectives surprised Gail
Mordenti at her Largo home early that morning, hoping to catch her
bleary and off-balance.
They had an unsolved murder on their
hands, an especially cruel one.
Thelma Royston, a 54-year-old woman who raised paint horses, had been
found riddled with bullets and stab wounds in the dirt of her Odessa
horse barn.
Now, nine months later, the
investigation pointed to Gail Mordenti, a cash-strapped,
twice-divorced, 40-year-old car dealer whose blue eyes lingered in
men's minds. And on March 8, 1990, as detectives drove her to Tampa for
questioning, she looked ashen, petrified.
"What would happen to me," she said
nervously, "if I tell you what happened?"
A prosecutor cut the deal: If she
named names, she would get a pass.
So she admitted that she had set up the
murder, at the insistence of
the victim's husband. She said she had personally ferried $17,000 from
the husband to the hit man, who kicked back some cash to her.
And she told detectives the hit man's
name.
It was Michael, she said. My
ex-husband.
No other evidence linked Michael
Mordenti, a St. Petersburg used car
dealer, to the crime. Detectives had no eyewitnesses, no fingerprints,
no DNA samples, no hair fibers implicating him. Before Gail Mordenti
gave her statement, a detective would say, her ex- husband had not even
been a suspect.
In the end, she would walk away,
free and clear, from the murder she orchestrated. And her word would
send Michael Mordenti to Florida's death row.
In
the 13 years that Mordenti has awaited execution, however, his case has
left a troubling legacy. There is the former superstar prosecutor who
misrepresented or concealed crucial evidence and has been excoriated
for misconduct in other cases. There is the novice defense attorney who
has admitted to critical blunders in Mordenti's trial and has since
left the practice of law. And there is the star witness' datebook,
never shown to jurors, which casts doubt on the state's official
version of events.
The Florida Supreme Court is
now deciding whether Mordenti deserves a new trial. At a hearing March
5, at least two justices expressed grave doubts about a case that
hinges entirely on the word of an unpunished accomplice to murder.
There's no telling when the court will rule.
"Don't we have a substantial problem?"
Chief Justice Harry Lee Anstead asked the state's attorneys.
If Mordenti, now 62, is an innocent man
on death row, a startling
confluence of bad lawyering and bad luck sent him there. If he's
guilty, some of those same legal missteps may soon set a killer free.
A marriage, a murder
The marriage of Larry and Thelma
Royston lasted 19 years. By summer 1989, it was long sour. Both wanted
out.
They shared a home at High Acres Paint
Horse Farm on Gunn Highway, in
northwest Hillsborough County, but they led separate lives.
Charming and soft-spoken, Larry Royston
was a serial adulterer who
disappeared on frequent ski trips. To his lovers, he wove a well-
rehearsed tale designed to elicit pity: His wife was a lesbian who
would "take him to the cleaners" in a divorce.
Over the years, Thelma Royston had
forgiven her husband his
infidelities. But in mid 1989, she broke down in tears and told a
friend that she didn't love him anymore, that she wouldn't let him
touch her for fear of AIDS.
Still, she was
scared to start over at 54. Her life revolved around horses. People
spoke of how she doted on them. She went to shows with her paint horse,
Pretty Dee Bar, or her husband's stallion, High Inflation. She immersed
herself in the daily routine of the 10-acre ranch, waking before dawn
to feed the horses.
Nights, before heading to bed, she
checked to make sure the light was on in the horse barn.
Late on June 7, 1989, the light went
off.
When Larry Royston brought this to his
wife's attention, she and her
74-year-old mother, Isabel Regar, walked out into the mist to
investigate.
A man's voice came from the darkness.
"Is anyone home?"
Carrying a flashlight, Thelma Royston
walked down the 300-foot dirt
driveway toward the voice. She called back to her mother, "It's okay,
Mom." She explained that a man had come to talk about Bubba, a horse
she had for sale. Regar saw her daughter go into the barn with the man.
About 20 minutes passed before the
Doberman, Dixie, began barking.
Regar went outside to check. She found
her daughter dead on the barn
floor. There were four bullet wounds and five stab wounds to her head
and upper torso. "An overkill situation," a Hillsborough sheriff's
deputy would call it.
An immediate suspect
Detectives would find no signs of rape,
robbery or burglary, pointing
to some other motive. Larry Royston vaulted to the top of the suspect
list.
His reaction to the murder seemed
strangely cold, his responses to simple questions cagey. He had
insurance on his wife. The killing pointed to inside knowledge. Who
would have known to extinguish the barn light to lure her outside?
The morning after the murder, Royston
asked a question that chilled
Sherri Loeffelholz, his wife's daughter from a prior relationship: Did
anybody know about our trouble as a couple?
No, Loeffelholz said.
I think it's best to keep it quiet, he
said.
Detectives soon learned that the
Roystons had skimmed $300,000 in
profits from their Clearwater air-conditioning business and hidden the
money from the IRS. Thelma Royston had made copies of the invoices,
planning to use them against her husband in a divorce.
Investigators also heard about Larry
Royston's numerous affairs, and
about what they called his "obsession" with murdering his wife.
He broached the subject of having her
killed, it seemed, with anyone he
trusted enough to help. He appealed to one of his mistresses, who was
once a manager at his farm. He offered to pay off her truck if she
helped. She balked but did not contact police.
Royston himself had an alibi: His
mother-in-law could attest that he
had been in the house, watching TV, when the attacker arrived.
For detectives, the question became:
Whom did Larry Royston send to the barn that night to act out his will?
An ex-wife's account
On the early morning of March 8, 1990,
Hillsborough sheriff's deputies,
alerted by tipsters, converged on Gail Mordenti's home in Largo.
They found her alone, in her nightgown.
She was scared. They waited for
her to dress and took her to the state attorney's office in Tampa.
In a previous interview, she had denied
knowledge of the killing. Now
she suggested that she knew more than she had let on. But she wanted
immunity.
Prosecutor Lee Atkinson granted it. As
long as she told the truth, he said, her statements could not be used
against her.
As Mordenti told it, she had met Larry
Royston two summers before, when
he came to install central air in her house. The two bonded over cars:
She sold them, he collected them. He kept classic Chevys and a
Mercedes. He owned thoroughbreds. He struck her as rich.
Early in 1989, she said, she invited
Royston to her house for lunch.
She was broke, stung by recent setbacks in the car business. She wanted
him as a partner in a new venture: With her know-how and his cash, they
could move a lot of autos.
He seemed interested,
but he had a problem. His wife was bleeding him dry in a divorce. She
was a lesbian, he said. She was putting him through hell.
"I need to have her done away with,"
he told her. Did she know anyone?
Mordenti told detectives she didn't
think beyond "trying to get my own
life straightened out" and "getting myself set up" in business.
She set about finding someone to
commit the murder.
She approached a "big Italian guy" who
sold cars on 49th Street, whose
name, it so happened, she didn't remember. She called a Jewish car
dealer in Clearwater, but she didn't remember his name, either. She
said she also broached the subject with a former business partner.
When those overtures went nowhere, she
said, she contacted her ex- husband, Michael Mordenti. He agreed to do
it.
By appearances, it wasn't tough to
imagine that Michael Mordenti might
fit the bill, might even serve as a Hollywood casting agent's image of
a contract killer. People remembered his unnervingly dark, penetrating
eyes.
He carried a gun in his briefcase, and
a
sheathed knife. He liked the camaraderie of other car lot veterans, who
gathered in the mornings at his home office for coffee. His language
was rough and salty, flavored by his native Massachusetts. He smoked
big, reeking cigars, favored dark clothes and bolted his wallet to his
jeans with a chain.
Gail and Michael Mordenti had divorced
in 1987 but stayed on speaking terms.
"Did Michael ever tell you that he is
the one who did it?" a detective asked Gail Mordenti of the murder.
She sighed. "Yeah," she said.
'Stay cool'
The same day, Gail Mordenti agreed to
place a call to her ex- husband while detectives listened.
She told him she was scared, that she
had received a subpoena from prosecutors in connection with the Royston
murder.
"You don't know nothing about it,"
Michael Mordenti replied. "You're not involved. So don't worry about
it."
"Well, what should I say?"
"Nothing. You tell them what you know.
That's all. . . . Stay cool. There's nothing to worry about. You didn't
do anything."
He asked if she had slept with Larry
Royston. She denied it.
"Well, what if they - if they want to
give me a lie detector test?" she said.
"You don't have to take nothing. No
way. . . . I don't take a lie detector for nobody."
He added, "I don't want to say too much
either" and told her, "Don't
talk nothing on the phone." He said he'd rather talk in person, that
they should meet at a car auction that night.
"I'm just really scared, you know?"
she said.
"Play cool," he said, and added: "They
have nothing. . . . They're on a fishing expedition, as usual."
Detectives arrested Michael Mordenti
and Larry Royston later that day.
The alibi
Michael Mordenti turned to one of
Tampa's premier defense lawyers,
Barry Cohen. Cohen's investigators got to work establishing an alibi.
They found an ex-girlfriend who swore
that she attended the Lee County
Auto Auction with Mordenti, 90 miles from the murder, on the night it
happened. She remembered that Mordenti wore a western plaid shirt with
pearl snaps and smoked one of his "large, nasty cigars," that he ate
spaghetti afterward at a Shoney's Restaurant, that they had sex in his
car beneath a freeway underpass.
A server would
recall serving them that night, though she had not punched her time
card to prove that she had worked. A car dealer would corroborate
Mordenti's presence at the auction, saying that Mordenti helped to get
the bid started on a Datsun 280ZX. A second dealer also remembered
Mordenti being there, puffing one of his cigars.
Mordenti soon lost his star attorney.
Cohen said Mordenti refused to
pay the fees he quoted and seemed "cavalier" about the need for a
robust defense.
Instead of turning to the public
defender's office, with its decades of collective experience in murder
trials, Mordenti wanted his own lawyer and hired one on the cheap.
His St. Petersburg bail bondsman knew
someone: an attorney in the office next door. Thus Mordenti found John
L. Atti.
Atti had been practicing law just three
years. He had never handled a
murder trial, much less a death penalty case. He agreed to represent
Mordenti for $50,000, paid for with the transfer of Mordenti's property.
Atti would later admit that he did not
realize how much it would cost
to take witness depositions in the case. He would say that he didn't
think Mordenti would even go to trial, so weak was the evidence against
him. He would say that Mordenti, insisting on his innocence, rejected
the state's offer of a five- to seven-year sentence in exchange for a
guilty plea.
Atti hoped the state would tip its
strategic hand when it prosecuted Larry Royston, who was scheduled for
trial before Mordenti. But in March 1991, the night before his murder
trial was to begin, Royston, 51, took an overdose of antidepressants.
He died alone in his widower's condo.
With
Royston dead and Gail Mordenti under immunity as the star witness, the
state had only Michael Mordenti left to answer for the slaying.
"It was my opportunity to get in the
big leagues, if you will, and take
on a murder case," Atti would later say of representing Mordenti.
It was a league in which he was
hopelessly outplayed.
His courtroom opponent was Karen Cox,
who had graduated from Georgetown's law school at age 20 and become a
prosecutor at 21.
By the time she got the Mordenti case,
still in her late 20s, she was
already amassing a record of high-profile convictions at the
Hillsborough State Attorney's Office that would build her reputation as
the county's top homicide prosecutor. She left to become an assistant
U.S. attorney in 1997.
Defense attorneys would later say
there was a problem with the way she won: She cheated.
The trial
At Mordenti's trial in July 1991, Cox
eviscerated his alibi defense.
She ridiculed the "amazing memory" of Mordenti's ex- girlfriend and
characterized her as "the conductor" of witnesses who conspired to
protect him.
The prosecutor pointed out that the
recollections of the car dealers who backed up Mordenti's story were
initially hazy on details about the night of the murder but
inexplicably improved over time.
The prosecutor
put on her star witness, Gail Mordenti, who stuck to her story. She
said that Michael Mordenti had told her of committing the murder and
had described the victim as having "a lot of really expensive jewelry
on - rings and things" that he regretted he couldn't steal.
Crime scene photographs showed there
were no rings on Thelma Royston's
fingers. Atti failed to point out the discrepancy to jurors.
Though it was not the murder weapon,
Cox introduced into evidence the
.22-caliber revolver Gail Mordenti claimed her ex-husband gave her. An
FBI metallurgist testified that bullets taken from Royston's body came
from the same box as bullets found in the revolver.
The gun was the single piece of
physical evidence prosecutors produced to link Michael Mordenti to the
murder.
Appellate attorneys would later call
the metallurgist's testimony junk science, but Atti did not
cross-examine him.
Gail Mordenti told jurors that her
ex-husband gave her the revolver
after the murder. This conflicted with her earlier sworn statement to
authorities, in which she said he gave it to her months before the
murder.
Atti would later call it "one of the
most important issues in this case." Yet in his closing argument, when
he tried to tell jurors about the discrepancy, the prosecutor objected:
Atti had not introduced Gail Mordenti's previous statement into
evidence. Circuit Judge Susan Bucklew agreed with the state. Atti
couldn't discuss it now.
Jurors would hear that
Michael Mordenti had been involved, in some unspecified way, in a bank
robbery investigation. It sounded bad. They did not hear the rest of
the story: Mordenti had helped the FBI catch a man who robbed a bank
using one of his cars.
Most devastatingly,
jurors heard the taped exchange between Mordenti and his ex-wife. When
Larry Royston's name came up, Michael Mordenti's remarks clearly showed
that he knew who Royston was.
In her closing
argument to jurors, the prosecutor painted Michael Mordenti as a liar.
She stressed that he had repeatedly denied to authorities "ever knowing
or even hearing of Larry Royston," despite the familiarity the tape
showed.
But Mordenti had acknowledged his
familiarity with Royston, in a February 1990 interview with a sheriff's
detective. According to the detective's report, which the prosecutor
had in her possession, "He never has met Larry Royston but has heard of
him via Gail."
It was another discrepancy Atti failed
to point out to jurors.
"I just failed to catch it," he later
explained.
Jurors found Mordenti guilty and
recommended death by an 11-1 vote.
The datebook
There was one other vital piece of
evidence jurors never saw: a
datebook belonging to the star witness. Gail Mordenti said she turned
it over to prosector Cox before the trial. But Atti, the defense
attorney, said the prosecutor never shared it with him.
In the book, Gail Mordenti marked down
April 11, 1989, as the day Larry
Royston met her for lunch and raised the subject of murder. This
contradicted her trial testimony that the meeting was in late February
or early March 1989.
Why was the April 11 lunch
date important? To Michael Mordenti's appellate attorneys, it
undermined his ex-wife's account of how the murder plot unfolded.
One night during the murder planning,
she said, Michael Mordenti paid
her a surprise visit at home, rousing her from bed. "Get up," he said,
wanting to stake out the Royston farm.
Gail
Mordenti would place this late-night visit sometime at the end of March
or the beginning of April 1989; she knew, she said, because it was just
before boyfriend Michael Milligan, who would later become her husband,
moved in with her.
To Michael Mordenti's
attorneys, the April 11 date suggests that the murder planning took
place after Milligan moved in with her. How plausible is it, they ask,
that an ex-husband would barge into the house and rouse her from bed
while another man lay beside her?
Isn't it more
plausible, defense attorneys ask, that Gail Mordenti fingered the wrong
Michael as the triggerman, in an effort to protect Milligan?
Messages left for the Milligans with
Gail's daughter were not returned.
The aftermath
John Atti did not last long in the law.
In 1993, two years after he lost the
Mordenti case, he resigned his law
license amid allegations that he misappropriated client funds and
failed to provide competent counsel in other cases. At a November 2001
hearing in a Hillsborough court, Atti, who by then was working for
Sears Home Improvement, acknowledged that he made oversights in
Mordenti's case.
Karen Cox, the superstar prosecutor,
is no longer putting people behind bars.
In 1999, the Florida Supreme Court
overturned the conviction of accused
contract killer Walter Ruiz, saying Cox and another Hillsborough
prosecutor had engaged in "egregious and inexcusable prosecutorial
misconduct." In that case, Cox told jurors of her cancer-stricken
father's service in the Persian Gulf War. The court said she improperly
equated his sacrifice with the jury's "moral duty to sentence Ruiz to
death."
As a federal prosecutor in 1998, Cox
allowed an informer to testify under a false name in an Internet sex
solicitation case. She resigned from the U.S. Attorney's Office in
2001, after the state Supreme Court suspended her for a year,
describing her as "a prosecutor who determines on her own when and how
to follow the rules." The court, however, called her conduct "an
aberration on an otherwise unblemished career," and Cox now practices
law in Tampa.
Contacted for this report, Cox
referred questions to the state Attorney General's Office, which is
handling the case on appeal. That office declined to comment.
Why they convicted
Asked why they convicted Michael
Mordenti, jurors interviewed by the
Times pointed to one piece of evidence that, for them, clinched the
case: the taped call between Michael and Gail Mordenti.
"I just remember him saying, 'They
don't know nothing, they're just
fishing,' " said juror Norman Haight. "If you were not guilty, I just
don't think that's something you would have said."
Juror Karen DuBois agreed, saying: "The
recording was to me very
damning." Thirteen years later, DuBois still remembers being unnerved
by Michael Mordenti's "dark, dark eyes."
"They
were cold, hard," she said. "He'd just stare at the jury, and I
thought, 'Not a good move. You're not engendering warm, fuzzy feelings
here.' "
The Florida Supreme Court
Martin McClain, the court-appointed
defense attorney handling
Mordenti's appeal, has helped free two men from Florida's death row
already.
Here, McClain sees a horribly flawed
prosecution based on the word of a woman who had good reason to lie.
While prosecutors see proof of Mordenti's guilt in his "cagey" remarks
to his ex-wife during their taped exchange, the defense attorney hears
something else entirely. He hears Mr. Mordenti trying to calm an
ex-wife who, as he knew, had become a suspect in the Royston murder.
All the tape really shows, McClain said, is that they had in some way
discussed the well-publicized murder before.
"I think she's the one being cagey,"
McClain said.
In the Mordenti case, he said, so many
things didn't jibe. In her hunt
for a hit man in 1989, why would Gail Mordenti make overtures to her
ex-husband, her ex-business partner and two other car dealers whose
names she could not even remember? Why not approach the man she
presumably trusted most: Michael Milligan, then her boyfriend, soon to
be her husband?
And why, the defense attorney
asks, did Gail Mordenti marry Milligan just weeks after her story
prompted arrests in the murder? Perhaps so they could not be forced to
testify against each other?
"How much misconduct
will the court accept from the prosecutor and the state?" McClain asked
the Florida Supreme Court on March 5, launching into the case's flaws.
He spoke of the datebook, of how the state led jurors to believe
Michael Mordenti might be a bank robber.
Robert
Landry, the assistant attorney general handling the appeal for the
state, admitted that the prosecution had not turned over the datebook
to the defense, but he could not explain why. The datebook and how it
might have affected the case were what Chief Justice Anstead called "a
substantial problem."
Justice Barbara Pariente
also seemed troubled. Without physical evidence, Pariente said, "How
could there be a case where credibility is more important than in this
case?" And in light of the datebook, she said, didn't Gail Mordenti's
account of the timeline collapse?
"We have one
woman's word, and now we have got several different pieces of evidence,
either withheld or misrepresented, that could change what the jury felt
about the credibility of Gail Mordenti," Pariente said.
While Gail Mordenti fingered her
ex-husband in the murder plot,
Pariente said, "She could just as well have said that she talked to her
boyfriend, Michael Milligan, and he said for 10,000 (dollars), he'd do
it."
The justice added: "She could have
said anybody in the world."
Christopher Goffard can be reached at
(813) 226-3337 or goffard@sptimes.com.
About this report
Information used in this report was
drawn from court transcripts,
depositions, Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office reports and
interviews. Times staff writer Dong-Phuong Nguyen and researchers John
Martin and Caryn Baird also contributed.
UPDATE:
The Florida Supreme Court granted Michael Mordenti a new trial, which
was conducted in August, 2005. Mordenti was again found
guilty. He was sentenced to life in prison with parole
eligibility after 25 years and credit for the 14 years he had already
served. He was released from prison in July, 2008.
|