Testimony Doubted in Execution
Case
By DEBORAH HASTINGS, AP National
Writer
August 29, 2001
A man executed
in Oklahoma last year was placed at the murder scene by the testimony of
now-disgraced police chemist Joyce Gilchrist, but a police department memo
obtained by The Associated Press says some of the scientific evidence she
swore to does not exist.
The July 31 memo by
a fellow lab scientist for the Oklahoma City Police Department refers to
the case of Malcolm Rent Johnson, who was executed on Jan. 6, 2000, after
being convicted in 1982 of rape and murder. Johnson, who had served time
for two previous rapes, insisted he was innocent.
At Johnson's trial,
Gilchrist testified that six samples taken from the murder victim's bedroom
showed semen consistent with his blood type. But a July 30 re-examination
of those slides showed ``spermatozoa is not present,'' says the memo signed
by chemist Laura Schile. Schile resigned Aug. 2 from the embattled forensics
lab, citing a hostile work environment. She names the lab's three other
scientists as agreeing that sperm is not present.
While the memo does
not exonerate Johnson, it marks the first time legal questions have been
raised about Gilchrist's testimony in an execution case. The memo also
noted that Gilchrist's testimony had been criticized previously. Two appellate
courts have ruled Gilchrist gave false testimony about semen evidence in
the 1992 rape and murder trial of Alfred Brian Mitchell, whose death sentence
was overturned earlier this month because of what one court called her
``untrue'' testimony. ``There are now two cases where the results stated
in the (lab) report and testified to by Joyce Gilchrist contradict independent
expert re-examination of the actual physical evidence,'' Schile wrote.
Prosecutors
said there was sufficient evidence separate from Gilchrist's testimony
to convict Johnson. But Oklahoma County Chief Public Defender Robert Ravitz,
who represented Johnson at trial, disagrees. ``It really calls into question
whether the state of Oklahoma executed an innocent person,'' he said Tuesday.
Problems with Gilchrist's
testimony in other cases have led to the release of three inmates who served
long sentences, including one on death row. Based on a preliminary review,
authorities previously said there was no taint in the 11 cases where prisoners
were put to death.
Gilchrist's attorney
did not immediately return calls for comment. The chemist has previously
denied any wrongdoing.
Ura Alma Thompson,
76, was found suffocated in her apartment on Oct. 27, 1981. There were
no witnesses to the crime, and no fingerprints matching Johnson's were
found. He was arrested after officers went to his home to question him
about an unrelated parole violation and noticed items belonging to the
victim. A search led to the discovery of her apartment key in his nightstand.
He contended all the items were given to him by a third party.
Gilchrist told jurors
that semen stains on the woman's bedspread and pillow case matched Johnson's
blood type, which constituted the bulk of evidence used to tie Johnson
to rape. The only other evidence stained by semen consistent with his blood
type was a knee-high stocking, Gilchrist testified. That stocking has not
been retested. A vaginal swab contained
sperm, but not enough to
test, Gilchrist told jurors. Gilchrist also testified that hair fragments
matched Johnson's hair and that fibers matched a blue cotton shirt he owned.
Johnson's trial marked the first time she had testified about fiber analysis.
DNA analysis
was not available at that time, and the court denied the defense's request
for funds to hire its own forensics expert. Johnson's attorney argued during
trial that blue cotton shirts were so ubiquitious that the fiber could
not definitively be linked to Johnson.
Schile refused
comment Tuesday on the memo contradicting Gilchrist's testimony, which
she addressed to Richard Smith of the Oklahoma City Municipal Counselor's
Office.
Kyla Marshall,
one of the chemists named by Schile, confirmed that when the slides purported
to contain sperm were retested, they revealed only a few fibers from the
victim's bedspread and pillow case. Sperm does not deteriorate for decades,
she said.
Richard Wintory,
a spokesman for the district attorney's office, said Tuesday that he still
does not doubt Johnson's guilt. ``The evidence against Malcolm Rent Johnson
is absolutely, uncontestably, overwhelming he done it, done it, done it,''
Wintory said. ``This suggestion that an innocent guy was executed is not
true about Malcolm Rent Johnson.''
``I am confident he
is guilty of murder,'' Oklahoma Attorney General Drew Edmondson said. ``He
was convicted and sentenced to death and there is ample evidence supporting
without consideration of forensic testimony.''
Gov. Frank Keating's
office said he agreed the execution was appropriate.
Oklahoma City
Police Chief M.T. Berry declined comment except to say that his department
was willing to have evidence from the Johnson case retested by an independent
lab.
Gilchrist was
suspended with pay earlier this year after the FBI, which reviewed eight
of her cases, concluded she had misidentified evidence or made other serious
mistakes in six of them. Hearings began last week to determine whether
she should be fired.
In the Mitchell
case, a lower federal court ruled Gilchrist had knowingly given false testimony
and that prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence from defense lawyers.
That court still upheld the death penalty, but the 10th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals overturned it Aug. 13, saying, ``We simply cannot be confident
that the jury would have returned the same sentence had no rape and sodomy
evidence been presented to it.''
Doug Parr, who
serves on the board of the Oklahoma Defense Lawyers Association, filed
suit last month against the Oklahoma City Police Department, claiming it
is illegally refusing to release public records pertaining to Johnson's
case. Schile re-examined the slides after a visit from Parr. On Tuesday,
Parr filed court papers seeking Schile's memo. ``It is yet another example
that Ms. Gilchrist is apparently willing to lie and present false evidence
in order to support prosecutors' efforts to convict persons in serious
felony cases in Oklahoma County,'' he said. ``The question right now is
did he commit the crime, period?''
The state attorney
general's office, which is reviewing cases in which Gilchrist's testimony
was pivotal, briefly re-examined Johnson's case earlier this year. The
attorney general said then that he was satisfied enough separate evidence
existed to warrant the execution, including the victim's property being
found in Johnson's home. In seeking the death penalty, prosecutors cited
Johnson's two previous convictions for rape in Chicago and the ``heinous''
nature of the rape and murder, and said he posed a danger to the community.
Johnson's public
defender said his client might have been spared the death penalty if he
hadn't been convicted of rape. But attorney Garvin Isaacs, who has represented
several defendants Gilchrist testified against, said any one of the aggravating
circumstances in Johnson's case could have resulted in the sentence, regardless
of the rape conviction. "It's Oklahoma,'' he said.
According to
a recent survey by Amnesty International, Oklahoma has more executions
per capita than any state. |