10/30/98
Woman freed from life term
in slaying
She claims self-defense,
but pleads to 3rd-degree murder after serving 12 years in jail
by Pete Shellem
SOMERSET -- A Somerset County
woman was freed from a life prison sentence yesterday, 14 years after rejecting
a deal to plead guilty to manslaughter charges in the stabbing death of
a man she claimed abducted her.
Patricia Carbone,
44, who had been imprisoned on a first-degree murder conviction, was released
after pleading guilty to third-degree murder.
Judge John M.
Cascio said the nearly 12 years Carbone spent in state prison for the slaying
of Jerome Lint was enough time.
`It's time to
close this case, for the Lint family and for you,` Cascio told Carbone
in Somerset County Court.
Although Carbone
's attorney maintains she acted in self-defense when she stabbed Lint,
who attacked another woman weeks before his death, he said the plea was
the safest and fastest way to get her out of jail.
`The bottom
line when I got into this was to get her out,` said Kevin Rozich, a Johnstown
attorney who has represented Carbone free of charge since her 1985 conviction.
`We accomplished that.`
Carbone claims
Lint, 26, an unemployed outdoorsman, pulled her into his car and attacked
her when she tried to flee. She stabbed him with a knife she kept in her
purse after he tackled her on a secluded, dead-end road.
Carbone 's story
was supported by physical evidence and independent witnesses, and in part
by police, who confirmed she and Lint did not know each other prior to
the June 9, 1984, attack.
Despite the
facts of the case, Carbone yesterday delivered a tearful apology to Lint's
family:
`If you can't
find it in your hearts to forgive me, I understand. I just know that it
was a terrible terrible thing that happened and I
do grieve with you and for
you.`
Lint's widow
and family declined comment after the brief proceeding.
Senior Deputy
Attorney General Paul E. von Geis, who prosecuted the case because Carbone
's trial attorney is now Somerset County's district attorney, said the
family agreed to the deal.
Carbone was
granted a new trial in January by a panel of state Superior Court judges,
who said evidence that Lint had attacked
another woman should have
been presented to the jurors deciding Carbone 's fate.
A chance encounter
Rozich had in 1996 with a former police officer who said she had offered
to testify for Carbone refuted the
prosecution's portrayal
of Lint as a religious, law-abiding family man.
Kathy Potter
told Rozich that Lint grabbed her in a Johnstown bar weeks before the incident
with Carbone . She said she had to fend him off with a pistol an hour later
when he confronted her while she was getting in her car in a dark parking
lot.
She was never
called as a witness after the presiding judge told Carbone 's trial attorney
he would not want every women that he ever tried to pick up in a bar to
testify against him.
The state attorney
general's office appealed to the state Supreme Court, saying Rozich should
have known about Potter's testimony, even though she was not named in the
trial transcript.
The office withdrew
that appeal last month, about six weeks after an extensive article on the
case appeared in The Patriot-News.
In that article,
two nationally known forensic pathologists who reviewed the case for The
Patriot-News poked holes in another key piece of evidence.
A prosecution
pathologist told the jury that with the fatal wound to his heart, Lint
could not have made it the 35 yards to his car, where his body was found
two days later.
Dr. Michael
Baden, director of forensic sciences for the New York State Police, and
Allegheny County Coroner Dr. Cyril Wecht said that conclusion was wrong.
Rozich applauded
the decision to put the case to rest.
`It's encouraging
that an agency like the attorney general's office had the courage to say
enough is enough,` he said.
At most, Rozich
said, the case amounted to voluntary manslaughter -- a position supported
by a half-dozen judges of Pennsylvania's Superior Court, which sent the
case back to Somerset County twice, most recently in January.
David J. Flower,
the district attorney who prosecuted the case, apparently agreed. He offered
Carbone a 5-to-10-year deal to
manslaughter before the
case went to trial in 1984.
While immediately
freeing Carbone yesterday, Cascio ordered her to serve seven years of probation,
saying the system must monitor her transition to freedom.
He said Carbone
's conduct in prison and her efforts at continuing her education show she
accepted her responsibility in the case, which he said would make a good
study for law students.
`Certainly there's
nothing anybody can do to correct the wrong that happened here,` Cascio
said. `It is my hope that you will be
able to put that aside and
live a life that is exemplary.`
The judge told
her she would carry the stigma of the incident for the rest of her life
and that people in the community would recognize her as the woman who killed
a man.
Carbone said
she had no problems in the community when she was freed for two years by
a state Superior Court order, which was overturned in 1990 by the state
Supreme Court.
`But I carried
how I felt in my heart,` she said yesterday after her release. `I'm the
one that looks at me every day and says,
'There's that woman.' I
only say that because I know so many people have been hurt by this. It
will come from me more than from the community.
08/02/98
Why is this woman still
in prison?
by Pete Shellem
When she fended off
a stranger who she says dragged her into his car, drove to a secluded road
and tackled her as she ran away,
Patty Carbone thought she
had survived every woman's worst nightmare.
She knew she
wounded him with a knife she kept in her purse for protection, but she
still fled in terror as the man got to his feet
and told her to calm down.
She said she
didn't realize he was dead until the police called her three days later.
She also didn't
know that the real nightmare had just begun.
Today Carbone , 44,
sits in the State Correctional Institution at Muncy, where she's served
12 years of a life term.
She waits, wondering
if an appellate court's recent reversal of her first-degree murder conviction
for the second time in 10 years
will finally win her freedom.
Charged with
murder in the 1984 killing of 26-year-old Jerome Lint, an unemployed outdoorsman,
she turned down a 5- to 10-year plea agreement to voluntary manslaughter,
believing her peers would understand her actions.
The Somerset
County jury didn't.
After a 1985
trial where Lint's widow and family, along with their priest and neighbors,
portrayed him as a religious, law-abiding
family man, Carbone was
convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without
possibility of parole.
The prosecution
conceded the two didn't know each other and offered little evidence of
a motive, except to suggest Carbone was
upset with her boyfriend
and had robbed Lint of $35 his wife gave him when he left on a fishing
trip.
But the prosecutor
argued that Carbone 's failure to call police after the attack, combined
with evidence of Lint's character, showed
she was the aggressor.
Now, evidence
has surfaced showing Lint wasn't the shy, peace-loving man portrayed in
court.
An off-duty female
police officer says Lint approached her in a Johnstown bar weeks before
his encounter with Carbone , and grabbed
her arm when she declined
his advances. She eventually ended up fending him off at gunpoint when
he approached her in the parking lot of the tavern.
A state Superior
Court panel decided in January that the evidence should be presented to
a jury and ordered a new trial.
But the state
Attorney General's Office, which took over the case in 1996 after Carbone
's trial attorney, Jerry Spangler, was elected
Somerset County district
attorney, is insisting that it is too late to bring in the new witness.
Sean Connolly,
spokesman for Attorney General Mike Fisher, said the office could not comment
because the case is in litigation.
But in a petition
to the state Supreme Court, the office argued there is sufficient evidence
to support the conviction and that Carbone's appeals attorney, Kevin Rozich,
should have been aware of the witness, even though her full story and name
were never mentioned
in the trial.
The office has
challenged Rozich's motion to free Carbone on bail.
Rozich said
if Carbone committed any crime, it was at most voluntary manslaughter,
a determination that the Superior Court made
in a reversed 1988 opinion.
`There is no
way in hell this is a first-degree murder case,` said Rozich, who has been
representing Carbone for free for the past 13
years.
The 12 years
that Carbone has served at Muncy is more than double the maximum sentence
she could have received for a manslaughter conviction.
In the meantime,
her mother has died and her daughter has grown up.
Carbone says
she has learned a lesson from her experience with Pennsylvania's justice
system.
`If I was ever
in a situation like this again I would never, ever lift a hand to protect
myself,` Carbone said in an interview at Muncy. `If I'm hurt, I'm hurt.
If I die, I die.`
-- HURT BY HER DEMEANOR
Only Carbone
and Lint know what happened on a dark, dead-end to a dirt road near Windber
shortly after nightfall on Saturday June 9, 1984.
While Carbone
's story of abduction, struggle and escape appears to be supported by much
of the circumstantial evidence, observers in the courtroom during her 1985
trial said her flat, emotionless demeanor on the stand may have lost the
case for her.
Some said she
came off as `trailer trash` as she told this story:
Living in public
housing since her divorce from an abusive husband in 1981, Carbone decided
to walk to a local tavern to meet friends
when she learned her boyfriend
was not picking her up until after 11 p.m.
Night had fallen
in Windber when a man in a tiny Honda Civic pulled up to her as she was
walking along the road, swung open his
passenger door and told
her a nice looking girl shouldn't be out walking alone.
She declined
the ride, but as she continued walking, he pulled in front of her again.
This time, when
she leaned into the passenger door to tell him to leave her alone, the
driver grabbed her hair and pulled her partway
into the car and said `are
you sure you don't want this ride.`
Still holding
her hair, he began drifting forward, and Carbone, terrified, pulled herself
into the car.
As she begged
him not to hurt her, he just drove. He finally said his name was Terry
and he was returning home from a fishing trip.
Carbone told
him she was expected at her father's house. She told him she knew karate.
If he let her go, she wouldn't tell anyone.
`But I was talking
and it was like he wasn't there, he wasn't paying attention,` she testified.
`He just seemed so, like numb, numb
to everything.`
When he finally
said he would take her back to Windber, she calmed down, but became hysterical
when he went past the turn and drove down a secluded dirt road.
When the road
dead-ended at several boulders, Carbone jumped from the car as it stopped
and began running. Her shoe fell off. She
reached into her purse for
a knife, but withdrew a brush, which she dropped to the ground.
By the time
he grabbed her and pushed her to the ground, she had the knife in her hand.
As he laid on
top of her, grabbing at her clothing, she flailed at him with the knife.
She thought it was stuck in his clothing because
he didn't cry out.
But suddenly
he stopped the attack and eased off her.
She testified
that she began screaming at him to give her a ride back home, but lost
her courage when he advanced again.
`I thought I
was done for because nothing seemed to phase him, and I was scared all
over again,` she said.
She bolted through
the woods toward headlights and out onto a highway, where bloody and still
holding the knife, she flagged down a
passing car.
Daniel Varner
would later testify that Carbone was hysterically screaming for help, saying
`he's going to kill me.` Scared himself,
Varner would not allow her
into the car, where his wife was screaming to leave and his two children
sat crying in the back seat.
Instead Varner
told her to get on the hood of the car, and drove her to the first house
with lights. As she was on the hood, Varner
said, she seemed to compose
herself.
The Varners
dropped her off about a mile away near the home of Clyde and Elena Boyer,
who had just finished a backyard barbecue.
Carbone said
she didn't want to frighten the Boyers as she had the Varners. She put
the knife in her purse, straightened her clothes and told them she had
a fight with her boyfriend. She explained the blood on her blouse and skirt
by saying she hit him in the nose. She still expressed fear he might be
after her.
The Boyers let
her wash up and offered her a ride home. On the way there, Mrs. Boyer agreed
to stop to pick up her missing shoe. She testified Carbone expressed surprise
that the car was still there and, fearful, they left without looking for
the shoe.
When she got
home about 11 p.m., Carbone went to the baby-sitter's house to get her
daughter but they weren't home yet. Crying, she called her boyfriend Donald
Nadonley and got no answer. She took a bath and called him again. He picked
her up and took her to a
nightclub.
At the club,
she kept going to the restroom to throw up. When Nadonley expressed concern,
she told him what had happened. He told her to go to the police. She later
told her baby-sitter what happened with the same result.
The next day
she went with Nadonley to a charity motorcycle run where she told three
more friends, who also suggested she go to
authorities.
She says she
was too scared to go to police.
Before they
left, Nadonley testified, they went back to the scene, where they found
her hairbrush. He said they didn't go near the car,
but Carbone showed him an
area of matted down grass where she said the struggle occurred. He also
said she had scratches on her legs and bruises on her thighs and buttocks.
The driver of
the car, Jerome Lint, was found by his brothers Monday evening after a
daylong search when he failed to return home
from a fishing trip that
Saturday. The car was parked in one of his favorite spots.
His bloated,
decomposing body was slumped over in the drivers seat with knife wounds
in his left back and side, consistent with
Carbone 's claim that he
was on top of her when she stabbed at him with the knife in her right hand.
The outside
handle to the drivers' door was smudged with his blood. There was blood
smeared over the inside of the drivers' door.
There were a few drops of
blood outside the car.
A woman's white
canvas shoe was found to the rear of the car.
Lint's wife
later testified she last saw him around 7 a.m. Saturday when he told her
he would be fishing into the evening and she gave him $35. Only $18 in
change was found in the car.
On Tuesday morning
Carbone received a call at Nadonley's apartment. It was the State Police.
They were at her parents' home
and wanted to speak to her.
After she told
them her story, turned over her clothes and the knife, they charged her
with homicide.
Police said
their investigation determined that the pair didn't know each other prior
to the encounter.
Carbone still
shudders and breaks down when she reflects on that night.
`I often think
if I had just let him rape me,` she said in the interview, sobbing. `But
all of the terror I had seen at the hands of
(her abusive ex-husband)
and all the times I felt like I was going to die came back to me. This
was all that and more.`
She said if
she could talk to Lint, `I would tell him I'm really sorry, but I'd ask
him why.
`He had a wife
that loved him. He had children. I don't know if he ever gave thought to
how he would feel if someone did that to his
mother, his sister, or his
wife.`
-- THERE WERE QUESTIONS
There were
problems with Carbone 's story at the 1985 trial, and Somerset County Assistant
District Attorney David J. Flower pointedly highlighted them for the jury.
How did Lint
pull her into the car and begin driving away in a car with a manual transmission?
Why weren't
Carbone 's clothes torn or dirty, except for a grass stain on her shoulder?
Why couldn't
police find the flattened out grass or any other sign of a struggle?
Why did she
tell the Boyer's that she had a fight with her boyfriend?
Why didn't she
go to police?
Flower, who
used Carbone 's conviction in his successful campaign that year for district
attorney and later in his unsuccessful run for
judge, said he didn't remember
the case that well and declined comment last month.
Perhaps the
strongest piece of evidence Flower had to challenge Carbone 's story was
the testimony of a pathologist who said Lint
would not have been able
to make it back to his car and open the door with a stab wound to the heart.
Dr. Karl Williams
didn't completely rule out the possibility, but told the jury Lint's wound
would be almost instantly fatal.
But that testimony
is disputed by two nationally recognized pathologists who reviewed the
case for The Patriot-News.
`I've seen many
people with this type of stab wound who got to the hospital who were treated
and survived if it was done in time,` said
Dr. Michael Baden, the former
chief medical examiner for New York City. `I've seen people with worse
wounds than that go more than 35 yards.`
Baden is perhaps
best known for his HBO television series, `Autopsy.` He currently serves
as director of forensic sciences for
the New York State Police,
and was the chairman of the forensic pathology panel of the Select Committee
on Assassinations, which
investigated the slayings
of President John F. Kennedy and civil rights leader Martin Luther King.
Baden's opinion
in Lint's case was corroborated by Allegheny County Coroner Dr. Cyril Wecht,
who also has worked on numerous
high-profile deaths.
`There are documented
cases of people walking and running after being stabbed or shot in the
heart,` Wecht said, adding that someone could be alive for up to a six
minutes, and conscious for up to a minute.
Williams' claim
is also contradicted by blood drops found outside the car and a smear of
blood on the driver's door handle, which put
Lint outside the car before
he died.
Somerset County
President Judge Charles H. Coffroth instructed the jury that Williams'
opinion should be considered `low grade`
evidence, considering the
physical evidence.
Coffroth also
pointed out there was `ample evidence` of self defense as a motive, and
dismissed Flower's claim of evidence of a
robbery.
He said the
mere fact that Carbone didn't go to police was not evidence of her guilt.
He pointed out that although the prosecution
argued that it was the normal
reaction of a woman who has been sexually assaulted to report it to the
police, a large percentage do
not.
`From her standpoint,
she may have regarded it as an unreported rape,` Coffroth said in his charge
to the jury.
Spangler, who
asked the judge to rule out murder as an option for the jury, said he never
thought the evidence could sustain a
first-degree murder conviction.
`Not until I
saw that jury coming back,` said Spangler.
-- LINT FREQUENTED BAR
Once a murder defendant
raises self defense, the burden shifts to the prosecution to disprove that
claim beyond a reasonable doubt. The victim's character can then become
an issue to show whether he has a tendency toward violence.
At trial, Flower
used eight character witnesses to portray Lint as a man who was `shy and
very backward around women in particular and people in general.`
He was remembered
as an avid outdoorsman and a family man who took care of his two children
while his wife worked as a pharmacist.
His widow, Danna,
who sat beside Flower about four feet from the jury throughout the trial,
testified `he was a very quiet, calm
peaceful young man` who
was `almost innocent at times.`
Rozich said
the testimony about Lint's character biased the jury against Carbone before
she even took the stand.
`My opinion
is after that widow got down off the stand, and said how her husband left
home and never came back, once she testified, I think the case was over
for Patty . Emotion overcame logic.`
Spangler's only
witness was Carbone .
While going
over his defense in a sidebar conference with Coffroth, he said he wanted
to present a woman who had contacted the
defense and said Lint tried
to pick her up in a bar.
Flower objected
and Coffroth, clearly misunderstanding the offer, said, `I'd hate to be
on trial for murder and have them introduce
against me all the girls
I tried to pick up.`
Spangler would
later testify that he took Coffroth's remark as a legal ruling against
introducing her testimony.
But in a chance
meeting 1996 after he had been representing Carbone for more than 11 years,
former police officer Kathy Potter
told Rozich she was the
witness and there was much more to her story.
She said she
knew Lint from a bar called Del's Cabaret in Johnstown. She had seen him
there numerous times harassing women.
Several weeks before he
was killed, Potter said Lint had approached and asked `what is your sign?`
When she rebuffed
him, he grabbed her arm and turned her around. Someone told him to leave
her alone.
About an hour
later when Potter and her friend left the bar, she heard footsteps behind
her as she was walking to bar's gravel parking
lot. When she turned, Lint
was standing behind her.
`I told him
to back off,` Potter would later testify at a 1996 hearing. `He continued
to approach me. I'm not easily intimidated,
but he frightened me.`
She said she
told him she was a police officer and threatened to `rearrange his genitalia,`
but Lint just stood there.
`He put his
hand on the side of my car and just stood there looking at me,` she testified.
She eventually
pulled her revolver, got into her car and drove off, to see Lint walking
back into the bar.
Lint's father,
Roy, contacted last week, said Potter's testimony must be false because
his son never drank.
`He'd never
been in a bar,` Roy Lint said. `He'd never even go in for change to get
a soda out of a machine. He didn't believe in going
into bars. He didn't want
to bother with people drinking.`
But Lint's impression
of his son is contradicted by his autopsy, which shows his blood-alcohol
level was approaching the legal limit
for driving. There were
also empty beer cans in his car.
An attempt to
contact Lint's wife, who has since remarried, was unsuccessful.
At the 1996
Post Conviction Relief Act hearing over Potter's testimony, Rozich suggested
that Lint's family was hiding their
knowledge of another side
to him.
`What struck
me was that he was supposed to be home at 9 o'clock,` Rozich told Somerset
County Judge John M. Cascio. `When he didn't come home, she didn't call
the police . . . She didn't even call the police the next morning when
he didn't show up. She did not report him as a missing person until Monday
morning.
`Was it because
he was not the peaceful, loving father, the non-aggressive person that
the prosecution claimed, but that this
wasn't the first time that
something like this happened and that's why the police weren't called until
two days later?`
Rozich told
Cascio that all the judges who have reviewed Carbone 's case have been
looking for a reason to set things straight.
`Kathy Potter,
Your Honor, is that reason,` Rozich argued. `She is the reason that Patricia
Carbone should have a new trial . . . The
defense failed to investigate
her; they failed to give a proper offer of proof,and it's time that Patty
be given the opportunity to do so.`
-- LOTS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
The entire
Somerset County bench, 12 Superior Court judges and seven justices of the
state Supreme Court have looked at Carbone's conviction.
Coffroth and
another Somerset County judge who ruled on post-trial motions agreed the
prosecution did not disprove self defense.
But citing a
series of state Supreme Court decisions from the 1970s that say the mere
act of taking a deadly weapon to a vital
organ is enough to the prove
the premeditation and malice necessary for a first-degree murder verdict,
the judges upheld her conviction
in 1985.
Months after
Carbone 's conviction, Flower became district attorney and hired Spangler
as an assistant.
At the behest
of Mary Parks, a television reporter who covered the case, Rozich, a Johnstown
trial attorney, took over the appeals for
free. He says Carbone sends
him $10 a month out of her $40 prison salary.
In 1988, Rozich
convinced a divided Superior Court that if Carbone was guilty of anything,
it was voluntary manslaughter. The court, in
a 5-4 decision, sent the
case back to Somerset County for a new trial on manslaughter charges.
President Judge
Vincent A. Cirrillo, writing for the majority, said there were only two
bases for the jury to reject Carbone 's
justification defense --
that her claim she was in danger of death or injury was unreasonable, or
that she used excessive force by failing
to warn Lint she would use
the knife.
In either case,
the court reasoned that would amount to no more than voluntary manslaughter.
Carbone was
freed on bail to await the new trial, while Flower, joined by the Philadelphia
District Attorney's Office, appealed to
the Supreme Court.
Carbone moved
in with her father, Ralph, and took partial custody of her daughter, Amy
Lynne, who then was 11. She attended Cambria Rowe Business College for
a two-year associate degree in accounting.
In May 1990,
weeks before the end of her third semester, her father picked her up from
school and drove her home. Once inside, he
listened to his answering
machine.
It was Rozich.
The state Supreme
Court had reinstated her conviction. The authorities would pick her up
that evening to return her to Muncy.
`I felt like
I was exploding into a zillion little pieces,` Carbone said. `I knew how
it would effect Amy and Dad.`
Former Supreme
Court Justice Rolf Larsen, writing for a unanimous court, said the Superior
Court should have reviewed the evidence in a light most favorable to the
prosecution as the verdict winner.
The jury's determination
of Carbone 's believability should not be disturbed, Larsen wrote, adding
that there was sufficient evidence to
prove malice. The high court
sent the case back to Superior Court to resolve the remaining issues. The
intermediate court then upheld the conviction.
`The same court
that was willing to set her free put her back in prison and threw out the
remaining issues,` Rozich said.
The case seemed
hopeless. Then he found Potter.
At the hearing
in 1996, Spangler produced notes of interviews with Potter that were never
turned over to Rozich. The notes never
mentioned the incident in
the parking lot, but merely said Lint been obnoxious in the bar.
Cascio agreed
with Deputy Attorney General Paul Von Geis that Rozich should have been
on notice of Kathy Potter, even though her
name was never mentioned
in the transcript. The judge ruled Rozich had waived the issue since he
didn't address it on direct appeal.
When the case
reached Superior Court the second time, Cirrillo, in a 2-1 decision, ruled
in no uncertain terms, ordering a new trial. He lambasted Spangler for
not making a better effort to introduce Potter's testimony and the court
for saying there were no more
`loopholes` for Carbone
to squeeze through.
The Attorney
General's Office has asked the Supreme Court to overturn the Superior Court
once again. That court has not yet
decided if it will review
the case.
A hearing was
held in June on a motion filed by Rozich to get her out of Muncy on bail,
but Cascio still hasn't ruled.
Carbone says
she still has faith that God and the legal system will set things straight.
If offered a deal to plead to a lesser
charge for time served,
she says she would take it this time.
`At first it
felt like I would be selling my soul to do this, but after all this time,
I've come to know in my heart that God knows me,
he knows my heart, he knows
what was in the heart of that man that night. He knows what happened,`
she said.
`First-degree
murder had nothing to do with what happened that night.`
|